Materion Is - English

Materion Is - English

Materion is what innovation is made of. Learn more about how we provide innovative material solutions that solve our customers' most complex technical challenges. Visit https://materion.com/about.

Poisoned: The Workers of Brush Wellman, by Heather Lares

Poisoned: The Workers of Brush Wellman, by Heather Lares

It has been documented over the last thirty years that exposure to Beryllium Oxide is harmful and potentially deadly. Brush Wellman, a Beryllium Oxide manufacturer, has a horrible past of endangering its workers. Poisoned: The Workers of Brush Wellman explores a Brush Wellman ceramics plant located in an area on the Southside of Tucson, Arizona which has a long past of environmental contamination. Two former Brush Wellman workers who have contracted Beryliosis as a result of their hazardous exposure to Berylium tell of Brush Wellman's careless attitude toward its workers and how their lives and the lives of their family will never be the same.

21 September 2011 Corporation for Enterprise Development rings the NYSE Opening Bell

21 September 2011 Corporation for Enterprise Development rings the NYSE Opening Bell

Corporation for Enterprise Development (CFED), a national nonprofit company focused on developing and strengthening programs that address the growing wealth disparities in our country, visited the NYSE. In honor of the occasion, President Andrea Levere rang The Opening BellSM. Interview by NYSE Anthony Drizis About CFED: CFED (http://www.cfed.org) expands economic opportunity by helping Americans start and grow businesses, go to college, own a home and save for their children's and own economic futures. We identify promising ideas, test and refine them in communities to find out what works, craft policies and products to help good ideas reach scale, and develop partnerships to promote lasting change. We bring together community practice, public policy and private markets in new and effective ways to achieve greater economic impact. Established in 1979 as the Corporation for Enterprise Development, CFED works nationally and internationally through its offices in Washington, DC; Durham, North Carolina; and San Francisco, California. Interview by Anthony Drizis

Tuesday's Children Visits the New York Stock Exchange ring the NYSE Closing Bell

Tuesday's Children Visits the New York Stock Exchange ring the NYSE Closing Bell

On Tuesday, September 11, Tuesday's Children Board Member Bert McCooey, joined by family members of September 11th victims, and by some of the organization's corporate partners including Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, Guy Carpenter & Company LLC, Marsh & McLennan Companies, AON Corporation, and Keefe, Bruyette, and Woods will visit the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) to commemorate the eleventh anniversary of September 11th and ring The Closing Bell. Interview by Anthony Drizis To mark this occasion, Rudy Giuliani, Former Mayor of NYC, Bert McCooey, Board Member and former Chairman of Tuesday's Children and David Weild, present Chairman of Tuesday's Children will ring The Closing Bell. About Tuesday's Children: With a focus on family resiliency and strength through community, Tuesday's Children, in partnership with recognized leaders in the fields of child development, family advocacy and mentoring initiatives has developed an innovative platform of programs designed to address the ongoing needs of thousands of children coping with one of the worst tragedies in the history of our nation. Project Common Bond is Tuesday's Children's important initiative fostering healing, collaboration and leadership. Project Common Bond participants learn to acknowledge and respect differences, acquire conflict resolution skills and engage in peace-building and community service activities. Through this unique international community, Tuesday's Children will create global ambassadors working toward peace and service. (Source: Tuesday's Children)

The Rich in America: Power, Control, Wealth and the Elite Upper Class in the United States

The Rich in America: Power, Control, Wealth and the Elite Upper Class in the United States

The American upper class describes the sociological concept pertaining to the "top layer" of society in the United States. About the book: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0078026717/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0078026717&linkCode=as2&tag=tra0c7-20&linkId=2eb8359867676703c845d545981030e7 This social class is most commonly described as consisting of those with great wealth and power and may also be referred to as the Capitalist Class or simply as The Rich. Persons of this class commonly have immense influence in the nation's political and economic institutions as well as public opinion. Many politicians, heirs to fortunes, top business executives, CEOs, successful venture capitalists and celebrities are considered members of this class. Some prominent and high-rung professionals may also be included if they attain great influence and wealth. The main distinguishing feature of this class, which is estimated to constitute roughly 1% of the population, is the source of income. While the vast majority of persons and households derive their income from salaries, those in the upper class derive their income from investments and capital gains. Estimates for the size of this group commonly vary from 1% to 2%, while some surveys have indicated that as many as 6% of Americans identify as "upper class." Sociologist Leonard Beeghley sees wealth as the only significant distinguishing feature of this class and, therefore, refers to this group simply as "the rich." " "The members of the tiny capitalist class at the top of the hierarchy have an influence on economy and society far beyond their numbers. They make investment decisions that open or close employment opportunities for millions of others. They contribute money to political parties, and they often own media enterprises that allow them influence over the thinking of other classes... The capitalist class strives to perpetuate itself: Assets, lifestyles, values and social networks... are all passed from one generation to the next." -Dennis Gilbert, The American Class Structure, 1998 " Sociologists such as W. Lloyd Warner, William Thompson and Joseph Hickey recognize prestige differences between members of the upper class. Established families, prominent professionals and politicians may be deemed to have more prestige than some entertainment celebrities who in turn may have more prestige than the members of local elites. Yet, contemporary sociologists argue that all members of the upper class share such great wealth, influence and assets as their main source of income as to be recognized as members of the same social class. As great financial fortune is the main distinguishing feature of this class, sociologist Leonard Beeghley at the University of Florida identifies all "rich" households, those with incomes in the top 1% or so, as upper class. Functional theorists in sociology and economics assert that the existence of social classes is necessary in order to distribute persons so that only the most qualified are able to acquire positions of power, and so that all persons fulfill their occupational duties to the greatest extent of their ability. Notably, this view does not address wealth, which plays an important role in allocating status and power. In order to make sure that important and complex tasks are handled by qualified and motivated personnel, society offers incentives such as income and prestige. The more scarce qualified applicants are and the more essential the given task is, the larger the incentive will be. Income and prestige which are often used to tell a person's social class, are merely the incentives given to that person for meeting all qualifications to complete an important task that is of high standing in society due to its functional value. "It should be stressed... that a position does not bring power and prestige because it draws a high income. Rather, it draws a high income because it is functionally important and the available personnel is for one reason or another scarce. It is therefore superficial and erroneous to regard high income as the cause of a man's power and prestige, just as it is erroneous to think that a man's fever is the cause of his disease... The economic source of power and prestige is not income primarily, but the ownership of capital goods (including patents, good will, and professional reputation). Such ownership should be distinguished from the possession of consumers' goods, which is an index rather than a cause of social standing." -Kingsley Davis and Wilbert E. Moore, Principles of Stratification. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_upper_class

The Manchurian Candidate (2004)

The Manchurian Candidate (2004)

Academy Award® winners Denzel Washington and Meryl Streep, along with Golden Globe and Emmy nominee Liev Schreiber, mesmerize a whole new generation of audiences in Academy Award® winner Jonathan Demme's "The Manchurian Candidate." As the entire nation watches the presidential campaign hurtle towards Election Day, one soldier races to uncover the conspiracy behind it - a conspiracy that seeks to destroy democracy itself.

Mark Halper - Emerging Nuclear Innovations / Race to Reinvent Nuclear Energy @ TEAC4

Mark Halper - Emerging Nuclear Innovations / Race to Reinvent Nuclear Energy @ TEAC4

Mark Halper (of Smart Planet, Time Magazine & The Guardian) summarizes his research report "Emerging Nuclear Innovations - Picking Global Winners in a Race to Reinvent Nuclear Energy". Mark contrasts thorium molten salt reactors with Bill Gates' TerraPower, General Atomics, QPower (pebble bed) and other companies pursuing modular reactors. China itself could build as many as 100 reactors by 2030, and is actively pursuing a wide range of nuclear technologies (100 companies). Mark Halper delivered his remarks at Thorium Energy Alliance's 4th conference, held in Chicago on May 31st, 2012.

How Money Controls Politics: Thomas Ferguson Interview

How Money Controls Politics: Thomas Ferguson Interview

Thomas Ferguson (born 1949) is an American political scientist and author who studies and writes on politics and economics, often within a historical perspective. He is a political science professor at the University of Massachusetts Boston and a member of the advisory board for George Soros' Institute for New Economic Thinking. He obtained his Ph.D. from Princeton University. A contributing editor for The Nation and a contributing writer to The Huffington Post, he is a frequent guest and economic commentator on numerous radio and television programs. He is known for his investment theory of party competition. According to Noam Chomsky, Thomas Ferguson was warned while at MIT that his research might get him denied tenure at the Political Science Department. In Chomsky's account, Ferguson was told "If you ever want to get tenure in this department, keep away from anything after the New Deal; you can write all of your radical stuff up to the New Deal, but if you try and do it for the post-New Deal period, you're never going to get tenure in this department." Although not explicitly mentioned, the research was ostensibly the investment theory of party competition. The Investment theory of party competition (sometimes called the Investment theory of politics) is a political theory developed by University of Massachusetts Boston professor Thomas Ferguson. The theory focuses on how business elites, not voters, play the leading part in political systems. The theory offers an alternative to the conventional, voter-focused, political alignment theory and Median voter theorem which has been criticized by Ferguson, et al. The theory states that, since money driven political systems are expensive and burdensome to ordinary voters, policy is created by competing coalitions of investors, not voters. According to the theory, political parties (and the issues they campaign on) are created entirely for business interests, separated by the interests of numerous factors such as labor-intensive and capital-intensive, and free market and protectionist businesses. In rare cases, labor unions sometimes act as major investors such as with the creation of the Labour Party in Britain, but are generally overshadowed by corporations. However, this is different from a corporatist system in which elite interests come together and bargain to create policy. In the investment theory, political parties act as the political arms of these business groups and therefore don't typically try to reconcile for policy. Within this framework, the Democratic Party is generally said to favor internationalist capital-intensive businesses (along with labor unions) while the Republican Party favors nationalist, anti-union, labor-intensive businesses. Labor-intensive investors made up much of the early political systems in the 18th and 19th centuries. Industries such as textiles, rubber and steel favor economic protectionism with high tariffs and subsidies. Since these businesses are mainly responsible for their domestic market, they are opposed to a Laissez-faire economy open to foreign competition. These industries are also heavily against labor unions since unionization increases the price of their goods. This is said to be responsible for the anti-union policies throughout much of the 18th and 19th centuries when these businesses controlled much of the economy. Due to industrialization and new markets in the 20th century, capital-intensive investors became the new economic order after the realignment of the Great Depression. Industries such as oil, banks, tobacco (and General Electric) along with labor formed the New Deal Coalition. Capital-intensive industries have almost no percent of their value added based on labor and are therefore open to unionization, which, Ferguson states, is why pro-labor policies such as the Wagner Act were passed under the New Deal. These investors also favor international competition and reduced tariffs which is said to have led to the Reciprocal Tariff Act (in response to the Smoot-Hawley Act). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Ferguson_%28academic%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investment_theory_of_party_competition

Online Privacy, Bullying In Schools, & War With Iran (The Point)

Online Privacy, Bullying In Schools, & War With Iran (The Point)

Is the mainstream media pushing for war with Iran? What should we do about bullying in schools? Are we losing our privacy online? Ana Kasparian (co-host of The Young Turks and TYT University) lead this weeks panel to discuss these issues and more with Ramon Galindo (correspondent for RT America), Peoples College law professor Sharon Kyle (LAprogressive.com), and Brian Unger (host of How The States Got Their Shapes). The 'points' are from Alyona Minkovski (The Alyona Show on RT), Rosalind Wiseman (author of Queen Bees and Wannabees), and Lori Andrews (author of I Know Who You Are and I Saw What You Did: Social Networks and the Death of Privacy). Watch More Points: http://www.youtube.com/townsquare Jump to segment 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmBkr1tjSjs#t=18m15s Jump to segment 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmBkr1tjSjs#t=31m54s Alyona Minkovski: http://www.youtube.com/TheAlyonaShow Rosalind Wiseman: http://rosalindwiseman.com/ Lori Andrews: http://www.loriandrews.com/ RT America: http://www.youtube.com/RTAmerica LA Progressive: http://www.laprogressive.com/ How The States Got Their Shapes: http://www.history.com/shows/how-the-states-got-their-shapes/bios/brian-unger Ana Kasparian: http://www.youtube.com/tytuniversity & http://www.youtube.com/theyoungturks Twitter List To Follow: https://twitter.com/thealyonashow https://twitter.com/rosalindwiseman https://twitter.com/loriandrewsjd https://twitter.com/ramongalindo_rt https://twitter.com/laprogressive https://twitter.com/bungerla https://twitter.com/anakasparian https://twitter.com/thepointtyt Support The Point for FREE by doing your Amazon shopping through this link (bookmark it!) http://www.amazon.com/?tag=townsquaretyt-20

America's Missing Children Documentary

America's Missing Children Documentary

A missing person is a person who has disappeared for usually unknown reasons. Missing persons' photographs may be posted on bulletin boards, milk cartons, postcards, and websites, along with a phone number to be contacted if a sighting has been made. People disappear for many reasons. Some individuals choose to disappear alone; most of these soon return. Reasons for non-identification may include: To escape child abuse, such as child physical abuse, emotional abuse, by a parent(s) / guardian(s) / sibling(s) (especially). Leaving home to live somewhere else under a new identity. Becoming the victim of kidnapping. Abduction (of a minor) by a non-custodial parent or other relative. Seizure by government officials without due process of law. Suicide in a remote location or under an assumed name (to spare their families the suicide at home, or to allow their deaths to be eventually declared in absentia). Victim of murder (body disguised, destroyed, or hidden). Mental illness or other ailments such as Alzheimer's Disease can cause someone to become lost, or they may not know how to identify themselves due to long term memory loss that causes them to forget where they live, the identity of family members or relatives or even their own names. Death by natural causes (disease) or accident far from home without identification. Disappearance in order to take advantage of better employment or living conditions elsewhere. Sold into slavery, serfdom, sexual servitude, or other unfree labour. To avoid discovery of a crime or apprehension by law-enforcement authorities. (See also failure to appear). Joining a cult or other religious organization. To escape domestic abuse. To avoid war or persecution during a genocide. To escape famine or natural disaster. By the end of 2005, there were 109,531 active missing person records according to the US Department of Justice. Children under the age of 18 account for 58,081 (53.03%) of the records and 11,868 (10.84%) were for young adults between the ages of 18 and 20. During 2005, 834,536 entries were made into the National Crime Information Center's missing person file, which was an increase of 0.51% from the 830,325 entered in 2004. Missing Person records that were cleared or canceled during the same period totaled 844,838. The reasons for these removals include: a law enforcement agency located the subject, the individual returned home, or the record had to be removed by the entering agency due to a determination that the record is invalid. A common misconception is that a person must be absent for at least 24 hours before being legally classed as missing, but this is rarely the case; in instances where there is evidence of violence or of an unusual absence, law enforcement agencies often stress the importance of beginning an investigation promptly. In most common law jurisdictions a missing person can be declared dead in absentia (or "legally dead") after seven years. This time frame may be reduced in certain cases, such as deaths in major battles or mass disasters such as the September 11, 2001 attacks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_children

Top Videa -  loading... Změnit krajinu
Načíst dalších 10 videí
 
 
Sorry, You can't play this video
00:00/00:00
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
CLOSE
CLOSE
CLOSE