I'M A CRASH TEST DUMMY!!!

I'M A CRASH TEST DUMMY!!!

I'M A CRASH TEST DUMMY!!! ► Subscribe and join TeamTDM! :: http://bit.ly/TxtGm8 ► DANTDM US TOUR TICKETS :: http://bit.ly/DanTDMUSTour ► Follow Me on Twitter :: http://www.twitter.com/dantdm ► Previous Video :: https://youtu.be/m-qPvGlJ7t8 Today, I become a crash test dummy to explore the weird and wonderful open world! ► Check out Whiplash : http://store.steampowered.com/app/552130/ ► Powered by Chillblast :: http://www.chillblast.com -- Find Me! -- Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/dantdm Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/TheDiamondMinecart Instagram: DanTDM -- Credits -- All titles and images created by TheDiamondMinecart Intro/Outro Music by: MDK Song Title: Press Start http://www.facebook.com/MDKOfficial http://www.youtube.com/MDKOfficialYT Buy the song here: http://www.mdkofficial.bandcamp.com/ Free Download: http://www.morgandavidking.com/free-downloads

2017 BMW 5 Series - Crash Test

2017 BMW 5 Series - Crash Test

ADULT OCCUPANT Comments The passenger compartment of the 5 Series remained stable in the offset frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. BMW demonstrated that, for the passenger's side, a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. On the driver's side, incorrect deployment of the knee airbag in the full-width test led to penalties for this body region in both frontal impact tests. In the full-width frontal test, the knee airbag didnot deploy quickly enough to get between the right knee and the dashboard. Although dummy readings for both legs were good, protection of the knee/femur/pelvis region was penalised. BMW stated that the airbag deployment seen in Euro NCAP's test was anomalous and had not been observed in their development tests. Protection of the neck of the driver and the chest of the rear passenger was rated as marginal. In the side barrier test, maximum points were scord, with good protection of all critical body regions. Even in the more severe side pole test, protection was good, apart from the chest, protection of which was adequate. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assess ment of the rear seats indicated good protection there too. The 5 Series has, as standard, and autonomous emergency braking system which operates at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which m any whiplash injuries are caused. The system scored maximum points in Euro NCAP's tests, with complete avoidance of collision at all test speeds. CHILD OCCUPANT Comments In the frontal offset test, protection of both the both dummies was good or adequate except for the chest of the 6 year dummy which was rated as marginal based on chest decelerations. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the 5 Series is designed could be properly installed and accom modated in the car. PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION Comments The 5 Series has an 'active' bonnet. Sensors detect when a pedestrian has been struck and actuators lift the bonnet, providing greater clearance between its top surface and hard structures in the engine bay. BMW demonstrated that the system worked for a variety of pedestrian statures and over a range of speeds so tests were conducted with the bonnet in the raised position. Good or adequate protection was provided at all over the entire bonnet surface. The bumper also provided good protection and scored maximum points intests of its protection of pedestrians' legs. However, protection of the pelvis area was poor at all test locations. The autonomous braking system is able to detect pedestrians as well other vehicles and performed well in Euro NCAP's tests of this functionality, with collisions being avoided or mitigated at most test speeds TEST RESULTS Comment The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system showed good performance in tests of its functionality at highway speeds. Collision was avoided in almost all circumstances and mitigated in others. A driver-set speed assistance system allows the driver to limit the maximum speed of the vehicle as appropriate, and a seatbelt reminder is provided for all seating positions. interior New 2016 2017 Test Drive "SUBSCRIBE NOW"

2014 Mercedes-Benz M-Class driver-side small overlap IIHS crash test

2014 Mercedes-Benz M-Class driver-side small overlap IIHS crash test

2014 Mercedes-Benz M-Class built after August 2013 40 driver-side small overlap IIHS crash test Overall evaluation: Good Full rating at http://www.iihs.org/iihs/ratings/vehicle/v/mercedes/m-class/2014

1998 Toyota Corolla vs 2015 Toyota Corolla (Auris) - Crash Test

1998 Toyota Corolla vs 2015 Toyota Corolla (Auris) - Crash Test

Graphic crash test between new and old Toyota Corollas shows why we need drivers in newer cars ROAD safety experts have renewed calls for drivers to get behind the wheel of newer cars after an unprecedented crash test revealed shocking results. ROAD safety experts have renewed calls for teens and elderly drivers to get behind the wheel of newer cars after an unprecedented crash test between new and old Toyota Corollas showed how far technology has advanced in 20 years. The independent authority Australasian New Car Assessment Program (ANCAP) this week conducted a head-on crash test between the latest Toyota Corolla hatchback and a 1998 model — with graphic results. The test showed the driver of the older Corolla would likely have died as a result of the 64km/h collision, whereas the driver of the latest Corolla — which has a five-star safety rating — would have sustained minor injuries. Figures show older vehicles (built in the year 2000 or earlier) only represent one in five cars on our roads — but are involved in one-third of fatal crashes. The data shows the average age of all vehicles on Australian roads is 9.8 years — but the average age of vehicles involved in fatal crashes is 12.9 years (up from an average of 12.5 years six months ago). The figures go some way to explaining why deaths of 17 to 25-year-olds and elderly road users (those aged 65 and over) are over-represented in fatal crashes when compared to other age groups. “Not everyone can afford a brand-new car however, the figures show that there is less chance of being killed in a newer and safer car than an older and less safe vehicle,” said the boss of ANCAP, James Goodwin. “Motorists should buy the safest car they can afford,” said Mr Goodwin. The president of the Australasian College of Road Safety, and former chairman of ANCAP, Lauchlan McIntosh, said: “No one has a 1998 telephone — not a young person or an old person — so why would you have a 1998 car?”. “There are a lot of people who have made a conscious decision to put their kids in a better car, and a lot of older people buy a five-star car — but there are still a lot of young people who, unfortunately, don’t see a five-star car as important but they’ve got the latest telephone.” The ANCAP website ancap.com.au lists the crash safety rating of more than 620 cars built since 2004. The Toyota Corollas used in the crash test were bought privately by ANCAP from car dealers, and the test was conducted this week at Sydney’s CrashLab. The 1998 Corolla was a one-owner vehicle with a good service history that had travelled 130,000km and had never been involved in a crash, so was structurally indicative of a car from that era. The latest model Corolla was an ex rental car that had done 29,000km, indicative of near-new used cars for sale. CAR SAFETY: THEN AND NOW 1998 Toyota Corolla Price when new: $23,000 Price today: $4500 Safety: No driver’s airbag, no antiskid brakes (they were part of a $990 option pack). 2015 Toyota Corolla Priced when new: $23,000 Price today: $16,000 Safety: Seven airbags, electronic stability control, antiskid brakes, rear view camera, force limiting seatbelts, seatbelt pre-tensioners. Automatic emergency braking optional. Read More http://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/motoring/graphic-crash-test-between-new-and-old-toyota-corollas-shows-why-we-need-drivers-in-newer-cars/news-story/c4e37152b2c575222105b48155f4cf70 "SUBSCRIBE NOW"

I'M A CRASH TEST DUMMY! (Whiplash)

I'M A CRASH TEST DUMMY! (Whiplash)

► I BECAME A CRASH TEST DUMMY! Whiplash ► SUBSCRIBE! - http://bit.ly/1PkfmsN ► FOLLOW ME! - https://twitter.com/Slogomanify • MY FRIENDS! KWEBBELKOP - https://www.youtube.com/user/kwebbelkop JELLY - https://www.youtube.com/user/JellyYT • TWITTER - @Slogomanify https://twitter.com/slogomanify • INSTAGRAM - @Slogomanify http://instagram.com/slogomanify • SNAPCHAT - slogomanify • FACEBOOK - https://www.facebook.com/slogomanify • MERCHANDISE! http://shop.slogoman.co.uk/ • Credits Intro: Electro - Swing || Jamie Berry Ft. Octavia Rose - Delight https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aH5aq4V0Ywk&list=UUUHhoftNnYfmFp1jvSavB-Q Outro: Electro Swing || Jazzotron - I Can Swing (Grant Lazlo remix) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yniX_HGV0wU https://soundcloud.com/jamie-berry https://www.facebook.com/flakrecs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYXHv97kbps Epidemic Sound - http://bit.ly/1UPtCyx If you enjoyed the video, a like would be awesome and subscribe if you want to see more!

1959 Chevrolet Bel Air vs. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu IIHS crash test

1959 Chevrolet Bel Air vs. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu IIHS crash test

IIHS 50th anniversary demonstration test • September 9, 2009 In the 50 years since US insurers organized the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, car crashworthiness has improved. Demonstrating this was a crash test conducted between a 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air and a 2009 Chevrolet Malibu. In a real-world collision similar to this test, occupants of the new model would fare much better than in the vintage Chevy. "It was night and day, the difference in occupant protection," says Institute president Adrian Lund. "What this test shows is that automakers don't build cars like they used to. They build them better." The crash test was conducted at an event to celebrate the contributions of auto insurers to highway safety progress over 50 years. Beginning with the Institute's 1959 founding, insurers have maintained the resolve, articulated in the 1950s, to "conduct, sponsor, and encourage programs designed to aid in the conservation and preservation of life and property from the hazards of highway accidents." More information at http://www.iihs.org

Mercedes V-Class V-Klasse 2015 crash test & ESC test - Autogefühl

Mercedes V-Class V-Klasse 2015 crash test & ESC test - Autogefühl

The Mercedes V-Class scores 5/5 stars in the Euro NCAP crash test. Also check out the ESC test. Safety Ratings: Adult: 93 % Child: 87 % Pedestrian: 67 % Safety Assist: 85 % (very good values!) Videos: http://tv.autogefuehl.de German Blog: http://autogefuehl.de Facebook: http://facebook.de/autogefuehl Twitter: https://twitter.com/autogefuehl Recommended: http://newcarz.de

Crash Test 1999-2005 Mercedes Benz ML 320 Class (Frontal Offset) IIHS

Crash Test 1999-2005 Mercedes Benz ML 320 Class (Frontal Offset) IIHS

Mercedes M class 1999-2005 models mfg. after Mar. 1999 FRONTAL OFFSET TEST OVERALL EVALUATION: Structure/safety cage Injury measures Restraints/dummy kinematics Head/neck Chest Leg/foot, left Leg/foot, right Important: Frontal crash test ratings can be compared only among vehicles of similar weight. Good Acceptable Marginal Poor Test details: The Mercedes M class was introduced in the 1998 model year. All M class models manufactured after March 1999 include structural changes to improve occupant protection in frontal crashes (note: information about when a specific vehicle was manufactured is on the certification label typically affixed to the car on or near the driver door). The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has evaluated the crashworthiness of a 1999 ML 320 with the structural changes in a 40 mph frontal offset crash test into a deformable barrier. A redesigned M class has been introduced for the 2006 model year. Restraints/dummy kinematics — Dummy movement was well controlled. During rebound, the dummy's head hit the B-pillar. Injury measures — Measures taken from the head, chest, and legs indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity. Forces on the neck indicate that injuries to the neck would be possible. Head acceleration from the B-pillar hit was low.

► Smart Fortwo VS Mercedes E-Class - CRASH TEST

► Smart Fortwo VS Mercedes E-Class - CRASH TEST

More Crash Test on http://www.youcarpress.com

Crash Test Dummies - Swimming In Your Ocean (Official Music Video)

Crash Test Dummies - Swimming In Your Ocean (Official Music Video)

Crash Test Dummies – Swimming In Your Ocean (Official Video) Listen on Spotify - http://smarturl.it/CrashTestDummies_SP Listen on Apple Music - http://smarturl.it/CrashTestDummiesAM Amazon - http://smarturl.it/CrashTestDummies_AMZ Follow Crash Test Dummies Website - http://www.crashtestdummies.com/ Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/ctdummies Twitter - http://twitter.com/ctdbrad Lyrics: When I'm sampling from your bosom Sometimes I suffer from distractions like Why does God cause things like tornadoes and train wrecks? When I'm swimming in When I'm swimming in your ocean Floating aloft on creams And scented lotions I can get pretty side-tracked I hope you'll understand When I kneel before your bounty Sometimes I wonder if there could be really UFO's that come from other planets When I'm swimming in When I'm swimming in your ocean Floating aloft on creams And scented lotions I can get pretty side-tracked I hope you'll understand And when you let me taste your fingers I take them like fruit and as I linger I wonder if my seed will find purchase in your soil... When I'm swimming in When I'm swimming in your ocean Floating aloft on creams And scented lotions I can get pretty side-tracked I hope you'll understand

Top Videa -  loading... Změnit krajinu
Načíst dalších 10 videí
 
 
Sorry, You can't play this video
00:00/00:00
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
CLOSE
CLOSE
CLOSE