I'M A CRASH TEST DUMMY!!! ► Subscribe and join TeamTDM! :: http://bit.ly/TxtGm8 ► DANTDM US TOUR TICKETS :: http://bit.ly/DanTDMUSTour ► Follow Me on Twitter :: http://www.twitter.com/dantdm ► Previous Video :: https://youtu.be/m-qPvGlJ7t8 Today, I become a crash test dummy to explore the weird and wonderful open world! ► Check out Whiplash : http://store.steampowered.com/app/552130/ ► Powered by Chillblast :: http://www.chillblast.com -- Find Me! -- Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/dantdm Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/TheDiamondMinecart Instagram: DanTDM -- Credits -- All titles and images created by TheDiamondMinecart Intro/Outro Music by: MDK Song Title: Press Start http://www.facebook.com/MDKOfficial http://www.youtube.com/MDKOfficialYT Buy the song here: http://www.mdkofficial.bandcamp.com/ Free Download: http://www.morgandavidking.com/free-downloads
ADULT OCCUPANT Comments The passenger compartment of the 5 Series remained stable in the offset frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. BMW demonstrated that, for the passenger's side, a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. On the driver's side, incorrect deployment of the knee airbag in the full-width test led to penalties for this body region in both frontal impact tests. In the full-width frontal test, the knee airbag didnot deploy quickly enough to get between the right knee and the dashboard. Although dummy readings for both legs were good, protection of the knee/femur/pelvis region was penalised. BMW stated that the airbag deployment seen in Euro NCAP's test was anomalous and had not been observed in their development tests. Protection of the neck of the driver and the chest of the rear passenger was rated as marginal. In the side barrier test, maximum points were scord, with good protection of all critical body regions. Even in the more severe side pole test, protection was good, apart from the chest, protection of which was adequate. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assess ment of the rear seats indicated good protection there too. The 5 Series has, as standard, and autonomous emergency braking system which operates at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which m any whiplash injuries are caused. The system scored maximum points in Euro NCAP's tests, with complete avoidance of collision at all test speeds. CHILD OCCUPANT Comments In the frontal offset test, protection of both the both dummies was good or adequate except for the chest of the 6 year dummy which was rated as marginal based on chest decelerations. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the 5 Series is designed could be properly installed and accom modated in the car. PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION Comments The 5 Series has an 'active' bonnet. Sensors detect when a pedestrian has been struck and actuators lift the bonnet, providing greater clearance between its top surface and hard structures in the engine bay. BMW demonstrated that the system worked for a variety of pedestrian statures and over a range of speeds so tests were conducted with the bonnet in the raised position. Good or adequate protection was provided at all over the entire bonnet surface. The bumper also provided good protection and scored maximum points intests of its protection of pedestrians' legs. However, protection of the pelvis area was poor at all test locations. The autonomous braking system is able to detect pedestrians as well other vehicles and performed well in Euro NCAP's tests of this functionality, with collisions being avoided or mitigated at most test speeds TEST RESULTS Comment The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system showed good performance in tests of its functionality at highway speeds. Collision was avoided in almost all circumstances and mitigated in others. A driver-set speed assistance system allows the driver to limit the maximum speed of the vehicle as appropriate, and a seatbelt reminder is provided for all seating positions. interior New 2016 2017 Test Drive "SUBSCRIBE NOW"
2014 Mercedes-Benz M-Class built after August 2013 40 driver-side small overlap IIHS crash test Overall evaluation: Good Full rating at http://www.iihs.org/iihs/ratings/vehicle/v/mercedes/m-class/2014
Smart Vs Mercedes S-Class: car crash and accident test video.
► I BECAME A CRASH TEST DUMMY! Whiplash ► SUBSCRIBE! - http://bit.ly/1PkfmsN ► FOLLOW ME! - https://twitter.com/Slogomanify • MY FRIENDS! KWEBBELKOP - https://www.youtube.com/user/kwebbelkop JELLY - https://www.youtube.com/user/JellyYT • TWITTER - @Slogomanify https://twitter.com/slogomanify • INSTAGRAM - @Slogomanify http://instagram.com/slogomanify • SNAPCHAT - slogomanify • FACEBOOK - https://www.facebook.com/slogomanify • MERCHANDISE! http://shop.slogoman.co.uk/ • Credits Intro: Electro - Swing || Jamie Berry Ft. Octavia Rose - Delight https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aH5aq4V0Ywk&list=UUUHhoftNnYfmFp1jvSavB-Q Outro: Electro Swing || Jazzotron - I Can Swing (Grant Lazlo remix) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yniX_HGV0wU https://soundcloud.com/jamie-berry https://www.facebook.com/flakrecs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYXHv97kbps Epidemic Sound - http://bit.ly/1UPtCyx If you enjoyed the video, a like would be awesome and subscribe if you want to see more!
It's #ThowbackThursday! the gang decide to crash test the Smart Car. With an NCAP rating of 3 out of 5 stars can the little compact withstand a 70mph crash into re-enforced concrete barriers? For more fantastic car reviews, shoot-outs and all your favourite Fifth Gear moments, subscribe to our Official Channel - https://www.youtube.com/user/fifthgearuk
IIHS 50th anniversary demonstration test • September 9, 2009 In the 50 years since US insurers organized the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, car crashworthiness has improved. Demonstrating this was a crash test conducted between a 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air and a 2009 Chevrolet Malibu. In a real-world collision similar to this test, occupants of the new model would fare much better than in the vintage Chevy. "It was night and day, the difference in occupant protection," says Institute president Adrian Lund. "What this test shows is that automakers don't build cars like they used to. They build them better." The crash test was conducted at an event to celebrate the contributions of auto insurers to highway safety progress over 50 years. Beginning with the Institute's 1959 founding, insurers have maintained the resolve, articulated in the 1950s, to "conduct, sponsor, and encourage programs designed to aid in the conservation and preservation of life and property from the hazards of highway accidents." More information at http://www.iihs.org
Játékok kedvező áron: https://www.g2a.com/r/marci0328 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HUNgarianGamer1080P Jó szórakozást a videóhoz!
Mercedes M class 1999-2005 models mfg. after Mar. 1999 FRONTAL OFFSET TEST OVERALL EVALUATION: Structure/safety cage Injury measures Restraints/dummy kinematics Head/neck Chest Leg/foot, left Leg/foot, right Important: Frontal crash test ratings can be compared only among vehicles of similar weight. Good Acceptable Marginal Poor Test details: The Mercedes M class was introduced in the 1998 model year. All M class models manufactured after March 1999 include structural changes to improve occupant protection in frontal crashes (note: information about when a specific vehicle was manufactured is on the certification label typically affixed to the car on or near the driver door). The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has evaluated the crashworthiness of a 1999 ML 320 with the structural changes in a 40 mph frontal offset crash test into a deformable barrier. A redesigned M class has been introduced for the 2006 model year. Restraints/dummy kinematics — Dummy movement was well controlled. During rebound, the dummy's head hit the B-pillar. Injury measures — Measures taken from the head, chest, and legs indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity. Forces on the neck indicate that injuries to the neck would be possible. Head acceleration from the B-pillar hit was low.